top of page

The hidden cost of unclear research messaging

science illustration showing beakers and test tubes and data currents

When research communication drifts into ambiguity, the consequences are rarely immediate—but they’re always real. Confused stakeholders, wasted opportunities, and low uptake of outputs are often symptoms of the same problem: unclear messaging.

 

When research loses its shape 

Research organisations are under pressure to communicate more, faster, and to more audiences. In the rush to publish, promote and report, clarity can be compromised. Sentences stretch. Jargon creeps in. Messages multiply. What starts as precision in a laboratory or policy paper becomes noise in the public domain. 


Unclear messaging doesn’t just blur meaning; it obscures value. When audiences can’t quickly grasp what a piece of research means for them, they disengage. Projects lose traction and uptake stalls. 

 

Clarity is not simplification 

It is often feared that simplifying a message will dilute its rigour. In practice, the opposite is true. Clear communication honours the work by making its insights visible and usable. It defines the ‘so what’ — not by cutting complexity, but by organising it. 


Clarity comes from structure: a single purpose, a defined audience, and a tested message hierarchy. Every phrase should have a role. If it doesn’t, it distracts. 

 

The organisational cost

Unclear messaging carries tangible costs. Teams waste time explaining the same information in different ways. Stakeholders interpret findings inconsistently. Funders question outcomes. Public trust erodes. 


These issues are not communication afterthoughts — they’re governance risks. Communication that confuses is not neutral; it undermines impact and credibility. 

 

Building clarity into research practice 

At Coretext, we help research organisations audit their communication through a clarity lens. We map the message pathways between teams, test content against audience needs, and refine language until there’s alignment between intent and understanding. 


The result is consistent, confident communication — and research that reaches the right audiences. 

 

Ready to refine your message? 

If your organisation’s outputs aren’t connecting as they should, it may not be the science — it may be the messaging. 


Talk to us about sharpening your communication frameworks: editor@coretext.com.au. 

Comments


bottom of page